1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Three additional staff were interviewed on 8/02/2022. Two of the three staff interviewed stated proper supervision between staff and children was observed during the biting incidents and could not have been prevented the incidents from occurring.
LPA Mendez conducted an interview with the parent, (P1) of C1 on 8/1/22. P1 had acknowledged that they had signed the biting policy regarding their child (C1). P1 stated that C1 was terminated from care due to biting. P1 stated staff were not following the biting plan which included staff shadowing children who bite. P1 stated she was told by facility staff that they did not have enough staff to shadow C1 and therefore, they were not following plan of operation regarding biting.
During today’s inspection 6 staff were observed actively supervising 12 children.
There was not sufficient evidence obtained during this investigation to determine whether or not the facility staff were not following the biting policy as stated in the facility’s written plan of operation.
Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. This report was reviewed with facility representative and appeal rights were provided.
Notice of site visit must be posted for 30 days. |