1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 6/30/23 The director explained that they maintain a 8-1 staff to child ratio which is more than required by CCL. She further detailed their zone training & policy to maintain visual supervision at all times. She denied a lack of supervision. 9 witnesses were interviewed including 4 staff and 5 parents and all denied the allegation stating that there was good supervision at the facility and staff confirmed the 8-1 ratio. The LPA did not receive any of the requested information from the complainant regarding medical intervention or multiple bites and all the witnesses denied the allegation therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
It was also alleged that the facility is not following the admission agreement; specifically, that the policy is that they ‘will be dis-enrolled’ for bites that break the skin but they have failed to dis-enroll. The director denied this on 8/18/23 and stated they have never dis-enrolled a child for biting, she said they disenroll for unsafe behaviors and only after several attempts to correct the situation, she detailed a lengthy list of supportive tools and policies. She said they recently updated their admission agreement and had everyone sign the following: “In some cases, when a child’s behavior seriously and persistently impacts the functioning of the program or the safety of other children, the child will need to be dis-enrolled. For instance, children who break skin when they bite create significant risk to other children. In these cases, staff will work with the parents to identify alternative plans for childcare.” She said it was a hard decision but they recently dis-enrolled 3 children due to behaviors like throwing chairs or toys, choking, hitting kicking and screaming at nap time etc. Some of those children had bitten as well. She said she would never disenroll strictly for biting and more for a totality of unsafe behaviors and the inability to redirect during behaviors. 9 witnesses, including 4 staff and 5 parents were interviewed and 7 denied the allegations. One parent interpreted the new policy that children would be kicked out if they bit (breaking skin) and the other said staff told them the child would be kicked out if they broke skin again. The LPA reviewed the agreement on 8/28/23 and it states that they will disenroll if the behavior ‘seriously and persistently impacts the functioning of the program’ therefore the allegation that the facility is not following its admission agreement is unsubstantiated.
continued |