1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | There was no disclosure staff had failed to seek medical attention for child # 1 in a timely manner. LPA learned through interviews the facility policy depending upon the injury is to assess the child immediately, utilize general first aid and call 911 if necessary. LPA also learned that staff reported the incident in which child#1 sustained an injury to responsible parties immediately after it occurred. There was at least one more communication with the responsible parties before child #1 was released. In addition, staff attempted to get a second opinion on the severity of the child’s injury from a trained professional across street from the facility.
It was also alleged that facility is not adhering to the required teacher:child ratios. None of the parents interviewed disclosed any concerns regarding ratios, lack of supervision or ever witnessing staff handling children in an inappropriate manner. LPA observed appropriate teacher:child ratios on inspections conducted on 08/26/19, 09/13/19, 10/25/19, and 11/12/19. Interviews with staff, parents and children did not reveal that a staff member handled children in an inappropriate manner. Staff indicated personal rights and supervision are a priority at the facility. LPA reiterated the importance of sections 101229, Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision and 101223, Personal Rights to the director.
LPA observed and tested the half-door leading to the entrance and found it to be in proper working condition. Interviews did not uncover any information regarding this door malfunctioning or otherwise not working properly. Staff disclosed that children are not allowed to play by/around the door area.
Based upon interviews conducted and observations while at the facility, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or disprove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|