1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation, LPA was not able to obtain the preponderance of evidence from the reporting party. In addition, LPA interviewed day care parents who had no concerns regarding the care of their children or communication regarding incidents from the day care center. LPA interviewed day care staff who stated that they had not observed any inappropriately handling and that they were following the procedures to communicate with authorized representative regarding reporting injury. During facility record review, LPA observed there was documentation of staff development trainings for staff rectifications as per the center’s policy and procedures. Lastly, LPA observed that the center had followed Title 22 regulations by following reporting requirements. Yet, LPA observed that the center had not documented two incidents as per their in-house procedures but had followed proper Title 22 measures by reporting it to the Department. Meaning although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, no deficiency are cited during today's visit.
An exit interview conducted with Director, Lisa Westbrook.
A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided and discussed with Director, Lisa Westbrook.
A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days.
Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |