1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was determined that although Child #1’s mother had removed the father from the emergency card, the facility did not possess the required documentation, as stated in the admission agreement, from either parent to warrant denying the father access to his child. The investigation revealed the facility did not comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the admission agreement as it relates to the incident on 02/20/2020.
Based on documentation obtained, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Per Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, of the California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is found: (see LIC9099-D). Licensee was provided a copy of appeal rights.
An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, during which this report was discussed. A copy of this report was provided via email, return receipt requested. This report shall be made available to the public upon request. |