1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 2: Based on interviews conducted and review of facility records, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that incident with child receiving minor injury (scrape/abrasion) required immediate notification to child’s authorized representative. Facility does not have a policy in their plan of operation addressing protocol for reporting incidents to authorized parents/guardians/representatives.
Allegation 3: Based on interviews conducted and review of facility records, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that child’s diapering needs were not being met resulting in diaper rash. Facility does not have a policy in their plan of operation addressing protocol for potty training and/or diapering.
Although the above allegations may have happened or may be valid, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Per Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 3, no deficiencies are being cited. An exit interview was conducted with Director, Roxan Tutelian. LIC 9213 Notice of Site Inspection form is required to be posted for 30 days.
|