1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Continue from LIC9099)
It could not be confirmed if the injury happened at the facility. Statements from D1, S1-S2 & S4 stated that if a child did get injured at the facility, the parents of the child would get notified as soon as it occurred and D1 & S2 also stated a written report would be submitted to the parents and Community Care Licensing. Interviews from all staff stated they do not hit children. D1, S1-S2 did state that staff do play “Duck, Duck, Goose” with the children and would “tap” the children’s heads, but they do not hit children. S2-S4 further stated that staff do not inappropriately mock daycare children or see others doing so. S2 stated if a child was misbehaving, she would often speak to them outside the facility and let them express their emotions by shouting and join them in the activity to support them which could appear to others as mocking but S2 stated she does not mock children.
According to other interviews, A1 claimed there was a time when they saw a staff use two fingers to hit a child as a way for discipline and at another time and that they have seen a staff yell at the children for misbehaving. A2 stated that if any injuries occur, the parents would be notified and a written report created, which did corroborate D1 & S2 statements.
Parents Interviews from P1, P5-P10 indicated that they were notified of incidents involving their child having a minor bruise; with P6-P10 stating a written report was provided to them whereas three interviews from P2-P4 indicated that they have seen minor bruises on their child, with P4 observing an injury to their child’s neck, but they were not notified of an incident by the facility. P1, P5-P10 did not have any concerns with the facility at this time and children interviews did not result in any information to corroborate the allegation.
Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited. This report was reviewed and discussed with the facility’s Staff, Heidi Schmitz. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit.
|