1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with the Licensee, children, parents, medical professionals, law enforcement, children services agency, and poison control agency. Medical records and reports from law enforcement and children services agencies were reviewed. Site inspections were conducted and observations made.
Medical records indicate a likely accidental ingestion of marijuana but could not clearly pinpoint exactly when C1 ingested marijuana and the marijuana test cannot determine if it was ingested, inhaled, or entered through different way. Sources are unable to determine if C1 ingested it while at the daycare or home.
The Licensee denied the allegation stating that marijuana is not used or kept on the facility premises. Parents denied using and keeping marijuana in their home. Daycare children and parent interviews did not identify any other concerns regarding the facility.
The investigation did not produce any conclusive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged incident occurred. Therefore, the allegation is determined unsubstantiated. No Title 22 deficiencies were cited today. The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and a “read receipt” will be requested to acknowledge the receipt of this report. |