1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During various interviews conducted, including with all staff members that worked in the same classroom with Child#1, LPA did not obtain any evidence that supported the allegations. This facility does have a policy for staff members providing incident reports to parents/guardians. The facility does have a biting policy which was applied to the biting incidents involving Child#1 per interviews and documents reviewed. This facility does use a changing log that documents by which staff and when a child was changed. The reporting party stated Child#1 was potty trained before the child stopped attending the facility. The staff members interviewed did confirm Child#1 was potty trained before the child left.
Although it is possible that a facility did not provide adequate supervision which can result in an incident involving a child biting another child, the fact that there was an incident of this nature does not necessarily mean that there was a lack of supervision. It is still possible for an incident involving biting to occur in the classroom despite adequate supervision being provided because a staff member is not able to physically prevent interaction between young children.File review for Child#1 did show copies of past incident reports created by staff members. According to the facility an incident report is created and signed by a staff member than is provided to the parent during pick up. Although the copies of incident reports in a child's file can indicate that the facility is providing incident reports, LPA did observe that the incident reports themselves are not signed by parents when they receive the report. Although signature from the recipient of these incident/ouch reports are not required by child care center regulations, it can provide further evidence to prove that the facility is providing incident reports to parents.
During interviews, staff members did state that Child#1 did have rashes that were observed during changing. The facility stated that parents are notified and some type of medication is requested whenever a child is observed with rashes. The facility stated that the fact that Child#1 would have these type of issues with rashes was the reason why they encouraged Child#1 to get potty trained as soon as possible. The specific allegation involving rashes state that Child#1 was observed to have some sort of rash or blister after Child#1 was already potty trained. The staff members interviewed stated that a child is still monitored and checked for any type of accidents throughout the day and are checked after they are escorted to use the restroom. Although it is possible that Child#1 sustained some sort of rash or blister due to staff members not checking enough or not properly assisting the child with cleaning, the presence of a rash or blister does not necessarily mean this is the case. It is possible that a child developed a rash or blister due to other factors such as the child's personal health condition. It is also possible that the condition developed from the time the child spends outside the facility. |