1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3/4
No disclosures were made by five of the staff interviewed. Of the remaining three staff, one disclosed that the nose of C1 would run a lot, causing the face of C1 to be constantly dirty, but that staff would wipe their face with a wet wipie. In addition, that when RP’s concerns were relayed to them, staff became more diligent in cleaning the face of C1 throughout the day. In an email dated 06/07, RP stated that C1 had seasonal allergies for a bit and was experiencing “mild congestion.”
One staff stated that it is possible that staff did not immediately observe that the face of C1 would be dirty because C1 would wear a face covering (mask). Another staff corroborated that because C1 was dropped off wearing a mask, staff would keep the mask on any children who were dropped off wearing a mask because it was figured that is what parents preferred, but that after RP complained about C1 wearing a mask all day, the mask was removed when C1 arrived and then put on again when C1 departed.
As it is unknown what the crusted substance was on the left side of the face of C1 which was observed in the photo dated 07/25/22, nor why C1’s face appeared to be red (i.e. what caused the redness) in the undated photo taken by RP; and as Center staff appeared responsive to RP’s concerns, the allegation that “Day care child’s hygienic care needs are not being met” has been determined to be Unsubstantiated.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that “Day care child’s hygienic care needs are not being met" and that there was a violation of Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, Article 6, Section 101223 Personal Rights. Based upon the evidence as presented above, the allegation has been determined to be Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although |