1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Complainant stated child #1's temperature was measured again at 105 degrees prompting the child to be taken to the hospital. Complainant described the child as appearing red and drooling. Per complainant, an incident was witnessed where child #2 was observed alone without any staff or teacher supervision. Complainant stated that they and one other individual observed this incident with child #2, while Staff #1 and Staff #2 were outside with the remaining children. LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and director. Per director, she confirmed a case of fever for child #1. Per director, the parent was notified upon pick up of the child. Per director, this occurred around the end of the day when pick up of children occurs and therefore upon confirmation of the child having a fever.
LPA reviewed children's records and found that there were 3 cases of fever for 5/10/19. LPA confirmed that child #1 was one of the children among the 3 cases for that date. Based on child #1's record review there was an incident report documenting the fever, which notes a fever of 104 was measured. LPA observed that there was no notation that the parent was contacted nor notified. Based on the time noted on the incident report (5:30pm) and the time the child was picked up as noted on the sign out sheet (5:51pm), there was a total of 21 minutes where the child's parent was not contacted and notified of the illness. Per the facility's enrollment agreement, pg. 32 of the family handbook, and the Guidelines for Management of Illness that is provided to parents, fever of 100 degrees or more warrants a contact to be to the parent/guardian in order to pick up child. Based on the interviews and documentation reviewed, the facility failed to make contact with and notify the parent when child #1 was confirmed to have a fever of over 100 degrees.
LPA conducted interviews with facility staff. Disclosures made by Staff #1 and Staff 2 corroborate the allegation that child #2 was left unsupervised in the classroom. Per Staff #1 & 2, the child was left in the classroom as they were transitioning outside with the remaining children. Both staff were unable to explain how the child was left behind, mentioning that child #2 likes to hide. LPA interviewed individual #1, who witnessed the incident. Per individual #1, upon entering the classroom with another individual, child #2 was observed inside alone. Individual #1 confirmed there were no other staff or adults supervising the child. Individual #1 stated that they informed the staff, who was outside with children, that child #2 was inside the classroom alone. Per individual #1, staff returned to classroom to retrieve child and have them join the rest of the class outside. LPA was unable to determine the length of time the child was alone, but was able to establish that when witnesses observed child #2, there were no other staff or adults in the classroom. |