1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Since the allegation mentioned that the staff members were observed on their tablets and phones during pick up time, the staff member observed on a tablet could have been using it for signing out a child or communicating with a parent through a messenger application used by the facility. Therefore, observing a teacher using a tablet during pick up time in the classroom does not necessarily indicate that there is a lack of supervision since using the tablet is part of the staff members daily duties. In regards to cell phones, the facility stated that no staff members are to use their personal phones during their time in the classroom.
The complaint also specified that a child in care (Child#1) developed a rash from not being properly wiped by facility staff after using the restroom. The complaint also stated that a staff member chose not to wipe Child#1 because there was no toilet paper available. LPA Lee observed through Child#1's file that the child was considered fully potty trained by the parent. The facility stated that fully potty trained children in care are not given assistance with wiping unless the child verbally asks the staff member or if the staff member notices any signs that the child needs help. The facility also stated that If a parent were to notify the facility of soiled clothing, the facility would make a point to check the child for any needed assistance in regards to wiping the next time that child used the restroom. It is not clear if Child#1 verbally asked for assistance to the staff member after using the restroom. It is also not clear if the parent requested for additional assistance with wiping after the rash was observed. The facility stated it never had any issues with not having toilet paper at the facility.
Based on the evidence collected during the investigation, the allegation that Staff not providing adequate supervision and Child's needs not being met may be valid. However, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are found to be unsubstantiated.
The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours of operation. Failure to maintain posting will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars.
Exit interview conducted with Director Pam Deem. Appeal rights discussed and explained.
Page 2 of 2 |