1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 4/5
When asked about the discipline policy S1 uses on children, S1 stated “remind them of the rules, redirect, time out, then call the Director.” When asked whether these same steps were taken by S1 when it came to C1, S1 said yes, but that C1 needed “extra, extra reminders.” When asked what the primary form of discipline used with C1 was, S1 admitted that it was having C1 sit by themselves, as C1 normally could not keep their hands to themselves. Per S1, C1 could still be a part of the activity. During the 05/16/22 inspection, LPA observed C1 to be sitting on the picnic bench during outside play time; S1 was standing next to C1. When LPA asked why C1 was on the bench, S1 had stated that C1 had thrown sand at another child. When asked whether S1 ever made C1 sit alone in the boat on the playground as a form of punishment, S1 denied this, stating that having a child sit in a toy while on the playground isn’t punishment, adding that C1 would sometimes lay on the grass or sit in the boat by themselves of their own accord before rejoining the other children.
Though S1 admitted to having S1 sit by themselves, as S1 claims to have given C1 reminders prior to having C1 sit by themselves, and as S1 is responsible for the physical well-being/ensuring that the personal rights of other children in the classroom are not violated by being physically harmed by another child, and as there were no witnesses in the classroom to corroborate or to refute that S1 did not coach or redirect C1 prior to putting C1 on a chair on time out, the allegation has been determined to be Unsubstantiated.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that “Staff member uses inappropriate forms of punishment” and that there was a violation of Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, Article 06, Section 101223 Personal Rights. Based upon the evidence as presented above, the allegation has been determined to be Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove |