1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA attempted to interview P#1 and P#2 but was unable to reach party. Several attempts were made and were unsuccessful.
Per reporting party, it was disclosed that, C#1 was locked out of school, and was left unattended in the playground area, and was trying to gain access to the classroom. C#1 was crying and yelling for the teacher at the door. No one answered. C#1 told R.P. that she went to the park opened the big gate, went through the parking lot and went all the way home crying. “My teachers left me”, “the door no one opened”. “I didn’t hide, my teacher locked me out, I cry I say open the door and no one came, so I wanted to go home, I want my mommy and granny, then I walk home”. R.P, disclosed that C#1 home from facility is 0.6 miles away and a 13-minute walk for an adult. R.P. stated that C#1 passed major freeway entrances and exits, major streets, homeless encampments, and businesses.
LPA did observe video footage during previous inspection on 6/11/24, which showed S#2, S#3, S#4 and S#5 leave C#1 outside in the play yard.
Based on observations, video footage and information obtained and conducted with staff, review of all documents provided to LPA Perry during visit. LPA Perry determined that on June 10, 2024, at this above facility, staff were observed to leave the play yard and transition the children indoors when C#1 was not accounted for. LPA Perry observed the video footage and determined the C#1 to be unattended for 18 minutes and wandered off the facility premises to home address, which is located 0.6 miles from the facility, which poses an immediate risk to the children in care. Based on interviews, teachers were unaware that C#1 was missing until class was sitting for lunch and S#1 was taking head count for lunch. C#1 was found at home with mother.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging, due to lack of supervision, child left the day care and walked home without staff knowledge. Based upon the evidence as presented above, the allegation has been determined to be substantiated. Based on interviews and disclosures made during the department investigation, the preponderance of evidence and the standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22 Division & Chapter), have already been cited on 6/11/2024 for the same incident, along with Absence of Supervision warranted and immediate civil penalty. A Civil Penalty Assessment of an immediate $500 was accessed was already
|