1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed Staff #2 that was also present on the day of the incident. Staff #2 was not able to corroborate Staff #1's statement. Staff #2 did not observe the incident.
LPA interviewed the parent of child #1. Per parent, a lack of supervision was what resulted in the injury. Parent stated that the staff were not aware of how the incident occurred. Parent stated that the licensee was not caring for the child when the injury occurred.
LPA reviewed child #1's file and observed that the incident report and a copy were both signed by the parent of child #1. The incident report documents what occurred. LPA verified that licensee was not present during the incident, but Staff #1 was. Although licensee was not caring for child when the injury occurred, a qualified assistant was present at the time. LPA was unable to determine, based on the interviews and documentation reviewed, whether or not a violation occurred.
During inspections conducted to the facility, LPA did not observe neglect or lack of supervision. LPA observed two staff present on both 11/19/19 and today's inspection. The facility was compliant with staff-child ratios on both days. When children were present outside, staff was also present outside. During activities indoors, staff were present indoors.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted with Licensee Irma Canal. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
A "Notice of Site Visit" and copy of the report was issued. Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to do so will result in a $100.00 civil penalty. |