1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per staff interviewed, there were no disclosures of children being left unsupervised. Per licensee, she was notified by a parent that child #1 had gotten out of the gate leading from the backyard to the driveway. Per licensee she did not see the child outside of the gate. Per licensee, she was outside when the parent approached her and states that she observed the child inside the entire time. There were no other witnesses to corroborate this allegation. Per licensee, child #1 was poked in the eye by another child. Licensee states that the incident was an accident and could not prevent it. Licensee states that at the time of the incident child #1's parent was present and licensee was assisting with child #1's sibling at the time, laying out a mat for the child. Parent of child #1 was interviewed. Parent corroborated that the incident occurred but shares a different version of the event. Parent stated that licensee was "just standing there" when child #1 was poked in the eye. Based on conflicting statements, LPA is unable to determine if the incident occurred as a result of lack of supervision.
Per complainant's allegation that a healthful environment is not being provided as child #1 was left in a soiled diaper, there were no disclosures from other interviews conducted to corroborate that licensee leaves children in soiled diapers for an inappropriate amount of time. Complainant did not capture photos or was able to show evidence of how long the child was left in the diaper. Based on interview, LPA confirmed that complainant does not enter the facility and only was able to make the observation of the child's soiled diaper after the child was picked up by the secondary parent and driving away to their next location. LPA attempted to interview additional parents. Only one response was received and no disclosures of concerns related to the allegations were made. Based on interviews with licensee and assistant, the children's diapers are checked often: before and after eating, before and after naptime, and before departure. Children are also checked if they begin to have an odor of urine or feces. LPA was unable to determine, based on information obtained, that the licensee does or does not leave children in soiled diapers for an inappropriate amount of time.
LPA Cazares' observations during inspections conducted throughout the investigation show that licensee and staff frequently assist children to the restroom and change infants on the changing table near the restroom. LPA observed children using the restroom as often as every 5 minutes within an hour period and provider was observed checking an infant's diaper twice and changing once during a 2 hour period when the infant was awake. A police report obtained did not provide any information to support the allegations made. |