1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the first inspection LPA interview Director no other staff was at the facility due to school graduation. During the second inspection LPA interview Staff #1, assistant director and staff # 2. During the third inspection LPA attempted to interview child#2 that was involved in the incident child # 2 was unable to answer qualifying questions.
During an interview staff#1 stated that the complainant only observed a part of the interaction without the full context. staff#1 stated that child#1 was removed from the first seat due to a child # 2 was seated in that chair and playing with set of toys given to child # 2 by staff #1 prior to child # 1 entering the classroom. Due to covid-19 policy each child is given an individual set of toys during playtime that has been disinfected by staff. Staff #1 guide child # 1 by the arm over to the opposite side of the table to a chair no child was previously seated and give child # 1 clean set of toys to play with. RP heard the child #1 crying and begin yelling in the doorway of the classroom. Staff #1 stated she guide child#1 over to the opposite side of the table when child # 1 not comply when verbally asked. The assistant Director stated that the RP of child#1 was calmed down and spoken to with try to clear up any misunderstanding. child#1 no longer attends the facility, an attempted interview with child#1 was conducted via telephone but child #1 was unable to answer qualifying questions.
It is possible that staff #1 did not handle the child in a rough manner, and was just taking the proper action to protect the other children, staff of covid-19 outbreak at the facility. However it is also possible that the manner in which this action was taken was done in a rough manner like the complaint alleges. Regarding this allegation that facility staff handled day care child in a rough manner, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Based on the evidence obtained during the investigation through interviews with staff, parents and children, observation, and record review, the evidence does not support the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|