1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | unsafe manner.
During the interview with the Licensee, the Licensee denied observing or having knowledge of the following allegations; Staff did not prevent inappropriate behavior between children while in care, Staff spoke inappropriately to child in care, Facility was operating over license capacity, Staff hit day care child and Staff handled day care child in a rough manner. Licensee denied encouraging inappropriate discipline practices toward day care children, providing inadequate food services to day care children, allowing adults in the home to smoke marijuana during operational hours and transporting day care children in an unsafe manner. Per the Licensee, she has been in business for a long time and understands Title 22 Regulations and does her best to ensure the facility stays in compliance.
During the interview with staff, staff made no disclosures about observing any of the allegations stated above and denied the allegations to be true. During the interview with Staff 1, Staff 1 denied ever handling a child in a rough manner. LPA made attempts to interview Staff 2 regarding the allegation of Staff 2 hitting a day care child but was unable due to no availability. However, all staff interviewed described Staff 2 as being positive, playful, a good worker, and kind to children.
LPA was unable to interview Children 1, 2 and 3 due to no availability. LPA made an attempt to interview other children but was unable due to their age and ability / non-verbal. During prior visits conducted on 3/28/24 and 6/12/24, LPA observed several car seats/child boosters at the facility and also inside the transportation vans. The facility was also observed to be operating within the limitations of the license.
Parents interviewed did not present concerns related to the above-mentioned allegations and were pleased with the services and care being provided to their children.
Based on the investigation conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegations to be true. Therefore, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
The Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted and Appeals Rights provided. |