1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegations-2-5
Upon return at 1:30pm on 11/06/2019, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) initiated the complaint investigation portion. LPA’s observed 11 children napping on cots with blankets and shoes on the children. LPA’s also observed Staff #1 and Staff #3 supervising the napping children while Staff #2 was supervising a painting activity with 5 children in the backyard playground. Staff #2 stated “during nap time, children are given 30-40 minutes to fall asleep and when children do not fall asleep, they are allowed to engage in academic or artistic activities in the backyard playground.”
Staff #1, #2, and #3 stated that “when children misbehave, teachers use their teacher voice to talk to the children one-on-one or use thinking-time/time-out, allowing children time to sit down and think about their behavior.” Staff #2 also stated “she would not stay if she saw rough type of discipline being used on the children.”
At 2:45 pm LPA’s observed children eating snack at the same time, with no child being excluded to eat. LPA’s were informed by staff #2, 3, and Staff 4 that “if children misbehave … Regardless of, “Children are never denied food” as form of discipline. If children do not bring snack/food, Facility is prepared to provide. The interviews of Child #2 and Child #4 corroborated that denial of food is not a form of discipline.
Based on LPA’s facility observations, interviews, and a preponderance of evidence gathered from the facility, the allegations investigated above were found to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated means the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, Appeal Rights (LIC9058) along with the Notice of Site Visit were provided to Aasritha Puram, Director.
|