1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | At 11:38 a.m., LPA Escobedo interviewed S1, who states that the children in care are "good". S1 further states that there is no yelling in the home by S1 or Licensee. S1 states that she has worked in the home for 1 1/2 years.
At 11:05 a.m. LPA Escobedo interviewed C3, C8 and C10 and was unable to qualify the children. Therefore, LPA Escobedo was unable to gather information to address the above allegations.
Based on observation and interviews, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee. A copy of this report and Notice of Site Visit was provided to the Licensee, whose signature on this form confirm receipt of these documents. |