1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (5) of (5) staff confirmed the allegation. Staff disclosed an incident where a C1 arrived without a lunch from home. Staff stated they were waiting for the parent to bring lunch; however, the parent did not arrive during the scheduled lunchtime. Per S1 and S2 C1 was provided Goldfish crackers and oranges during that lunch time. Based on staff statements and a review of facility’s schedule, it was determined that the child was not provided lunch. Staff indicated that if a child does not bring a lunch from home procedures are to contact the parent. Staff stated that depending on availability, they may provide lunch if there are extras on-site or from another classroom. If no extra food is available, staff reported that will offer the child a snack or allow the child to eat their own snack from home. (2) of (4) children stated they receive lunch from the school. One child indicated that their parents bring lunch from home. LPA was able to interview the C1 referenced by staff in the disclosed incident. The child stated they were given Goldfish and orange by teacher.
The investigation revealed that the licensee did not ensure that a lunch was provided to a child in care during the scheduled lunchtime, as outlined in the facility’s daily scheduled. The providing of Goldfish and oranges in replacement of lunch does not meet the required Title 22 regulations of Food Service. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care.
Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation are found to be Substantiated.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days consecutive days. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a $100.00 civil penalty. Exit interview conducted and Appeal Rights provided with Kristine Manley, Director. Please see attached LIC 809-D for citations. (1) Type B was issued.
.
Page 2 of 2
|