1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3/11
people (only three of whom have Criminal Background Clearance); while another staff stated that there were two persons who lived in the residence, but the persons named changed between the 12/29 and the 03/14 interviews (but at least one of whom does not have Criminal Background Clearance). It must be noted that there are only two usable bedrooms in the residence. Documentation obtained by LPA verifies that licensee and her “ex” spouse live in and own a residence in La Verne.
Based upon LPAs’ observations, as well as the disclosures made by the two adults and the Reporting Party, and the documentation of property records obtained, the allegation that “Licensee does not live in the childcare home” has been determined to be Substantiated. A finding of Substantiated means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, Article 01, Section 102352 Definitions is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
-Pertaining to the allegation that “Licensee is operating over ratio”:
The allegation pertains to RP’s knowledge that licensee cares for between 14-20 children and used to have five staff, but now only has three staff.
During the 03/14/22 inspection, when LPAs’ arrived at 10:20 am, there were three staff and 12 children ages 5, 4, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, and an infant. At 10:30 am, the 13th child, age 4, arrived. Regulation 102416.5 states that, “A large family day care home may provide care for more than 12 children and up to and including 14 children, if all of the following conditions are met…At least one child is enrolled in and attending kindergarten or elementary school and a second child is at least six years of age.
|