1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
Reporting party stated that staff discriminated against daycare child. LPA interviewed parents, staff, and reviewed parent and staff handbook and observed that there is a policy for discrimination in both
handbooks. LPA observed that there is a discrimination statement in the parent’s handbook and a discrimination policy in the employee’s handbook. In the employee’s handbook, it states that, “engaging in conduct that violated this policy may result in discipline, or even termination of employment”. During staff interviews, all staff agreed that staff do not discriminate against children. During children’s interviews, no information was provided that can support the allegation.
Reporting party stated that staff did not keep day care child confidential. Per reporting party, confidential information was disclosed about child 1. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed handbooks. Per facility’s handbook, staff are prohibited from sharing confidential information about a child to anyone. The policy states that, [an individual] will always observe professional ethics and never discuss and/or seek information regarding children, families, or staff… During staff interviews, all staff confirmed that confidential information about children remains confidential. Based on interviews, no information collected supports the allegation.
Although the four allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a notice of site visit was given. Notice of site visit must remain posted for 30 days |