1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Page 2 of 3)
Per complainant, there was never a disclosure that child #1 was pinched, but child #1 began pinching complainant which lead complainant to believe that child #1 was being pinched by someone at the daycare. Per complainant, child #1 also stated being called “yucky pig baby” by other children. Per complainant, there was a concern about the behaviors displayed by child #1, which complainant attributes to the alleged violation of personal rights. These behaviors were said to have occurred at home during the child’s time attending the daycare and after child was no longer attending.
A forensic interview was conducted with child #1. Child #1 did not make a disclosure to support the allegation of personal rights being violated. IB investigator attempted two interviews with child #1 however no disclosures were made to support the allegation as well.
Interviews conducted by LPA with facility staff, parents and children did not reveal any disclosures to support the allegation nor did parties interviewed express concerns that children’s personal rights are being violated while in care. An interview conducted with Individual #1, whom had a professional relationship with child #1, did not reveal any disclosures made by the child regarding violation of personal rights.
Complainant disclosed while picking up child #1, they heard yelling which prompted complainant to look towards the rear yard at which point they witnessed a staff yelling at a daycare child. No other instances were shared. There were no other corroborating statements from other witnesses to the alleged incident or similar incidents. Staff at the facility denied the allegation, adding that they have never observed staff engage in the alleged behavior. Children and parents interviewed did not reveal disclosures or concerns with facility staff.
Complainant disclosed a concern in which they alleged that child #1 was given food in the facility that they were allergic or sensitive to. Per complainant, although no medical documentation from a health professional was provided to the facility regarding the child’s allergies or food sensitivities, there was a discussion with the complainant and facility staff. Per complainant, they observed child #1 to have a food sensitivity reaction while being picked up from the daycare. Therefore, complainant attributed these reactions to child #1 being fed these foods while at the facility. Per complainant they would inquire with facility staff as to what the child ate that day and that they were, at times, told that child #1 had been given food that provider knew child was allergic to. Complainant did not provide any medical records to support child receiving medical treatment for an allergic reaction. (continued on 9099-C) |