1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Both S1 and P1 stated that RP and family were not denied entry to an event held at the facility but rather allowed to stay. LPA was able to confirm this with RP during an interview conducted.
On this day, LPA reviewed and clarified the facility's Parents’ Rights policies regarding “Requests in writing that a parent not be allowed to visit your child or take your child from the family childcare home, provided you have shown a certified copy of a court order”. LPA issued a Technical Advisory on this day and explained to Licensees that the facility should refer to both Parents' Rights Policies and Court Order on file where it involves their licensed day care. This includes the transparency and equitability of correspondence with both the child's custodial parents and/or non-custodial parents who are authorized by a custodial parent.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted with resident, Sheila Balkcom. A copy of Appeal Rights were also provided to Licensees and explained that the Licensees have 15 days from this day (12/22/2022) to file an appeal to the department.
|