1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
Parent stated the child had only been in care for a little over a month. The first mark was not reported to the school. Per interviews with staff, they made mom aware verbally and written of the child's nails being long. Infant also use to scratch the staff with his nails that's why it was brought up to mom on several occasions and mom would tell the staff she would try to cut his nails but it was hard. Mom/aunt is in the process of adopting the child and DCFS has history of the family on file. Per interviews the baby was observed to roll over on his own during the incidents in questions and may have scratch himself. The facility also has a log where they document they child daily health checks, which means if they observe the child come into school with any marks or sick symptoms or when the child goes home with any mark or sick symptoms. Per conversation with the police detective they did not have enough evidence to prove if it happened at school or at home, therefore they went unsubstantiated with there findings.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
The Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) – must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Appeal rights were provided.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Harvinderpal (Palley) Vaghela, Director |