1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation LPA Lee interviewed children in the school age program. During interviews, children in care did not provide additional information that directly supported the allegations. During interviews, the snacks that were described by children did not match up with snacks described by the reporting party. It was also stated in the interviews that the girls and boys restroom had a soap available. LPA Lee verified that although there is soap available in the boys restroom, the dispenser did not work until it was pressed a few times. LPA Lee advised the facility to replace the dispenser so the children using the boys restroom can have easier access to hand washing soap when using the restroom. LPA Lee also checked the girls restroom and found that the dispenser had soap and worked with no issues when pressed during this inspection.
Although the dispenser being faulty in the boys restroom supports the allegation, there was soap inside the dispenser for the boys that can be accessed as observed during this inspection. Although the dispenser does have soap and dispenses soap after a few attempts, it was observed to not be perfectly functional. LPA Lee advised the Director to replace the faulty dispenser and the Director did replace it during this inspection. The restroom specified by the reporting party which was the girls restroom for school age children did have soap available with fully working dispensers inside which was verified on this inspection. Although the snacks that were observed in the facility were not expired, it is possible that the facility did feed the children the snacks that were described by the reporting party on a single occasion in the past. The children's description of the snacks provided by the facility also did not match with the reporting party's description. In regards to the allegation of children being yelled at by staff member, the children did not provide any direct information that supported this allegation. Staff#1 who was specified by the reporting party stated she did not yell at the child in the allegation. However, Staff#1 did state that the child was playing piano at the time, and she did have to repeat herself due to the child not responding the first time being asked a question.
This department has investigated the allegation that facility staff yells at children in care, staff failed to ensure children are provided hand washing soap, and staff provides expired food to children in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview conducted with Director Esther Choe. Appeal rights discussed and explained.
The notice of site inspection must remain posted for a period of 30 days during hours of operation. Failure to maintain notice during business hours will result in a civil penalty of $100.00 dollars. |