1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | recommending the center and reporting no concerns regarding the safety or well-being of their children. Communication from the center about incidents and concerns was universally praised as "very effective," "perfect," and "on point," often utilizing an app for real-time updates and photos. Parents highlighted positive aspects such as strong teacher engagement, good staff-to-child ratios, and overall positive experiences.
Staff interviews and written statements consistently describe C1 becoming inconsolably upset and crying extensively during a transition from the yard to the classroom. Staff #2 recalled holding C1's hand to prevent C1 from running, which Staff #2 stated caused C1 to cry due to "strong emotions." Staff #2 admitted telling Staff #6 and Staff #7, "C1 is crying because I grabbed them." Staff #3 verified overhearing Staff #2 say, "They are crying because I grabbed them," and observed C1 touching an elbow while crying at pickup. Staff #1 observed C1 crying persistently, noting C1 was unusually attached and distraught, and heard Staff #2 admit to grabbing C1. Staff #5 overheard Staff #2 yelling at C1 and confronted Staff #2 about the inappropriate method, advising focus on comforting C1. A number of Staff attempted to console C1 with hugs, snacks, and apologies, but C1 continued crying for an extended period, even after a diaper change. Staff #6 confirmed an internal investigation concluded the injury was accidental due to Staff #2 grabbing C1's hand during transition. Staff #7 confirmed that Staff #2's action of holding C1's hand, as described, would violate the staff handbook's prohibition against forcible restraining, leading to retraining and a counseling memo for Staff #2.
Based on these findings, Staff 2 actions were not found to be with ill intent; the grabbing occurred in an attempt to prevent C1 from running away from the classroom during transition from outside. However, the injury occurred while C1 was under the facility's care and was a direct result of a staff member's action, necessitating medical treatment. There is a preponderance of evidence to support that the unexplained injury while in care that required medical treatment occurred. Therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED.
Type B deficiency will be cited today.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Appeal Rights explained and given to Facility Representative- Gabriela Valdivia.
Exit interview was conducted with Facility Representative- Gabriela Valdivia.
Page 2 of 2
|