1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S1 denied the allegation on 8/5/22 at 9:20am stating that after this was brought to her attention, she interviewed the staff independently and none of the staff had observed that the allegation had happened.
Investigation consisted of the Director (S1) interviews on 8/5/22 and 11/9/22, four additional staff (S2-S5) interviewed on 8/5/22, seven parents (S1- S7) on 11/7/22 & 11/8/22, six children (C1- C6) on 11/9/22, observations made 8/5/22 & 11/9/22. Some children were not verbal, too young to interview, or did not qualify to be interviewed.
The staff interviewed (S1-S5) stated that they did not observe inappropriate behavior between day care children. S3 states that child, C1 does tell stories often that are not true and C1's older brother also does this as well. All parents interview P1-P7 had no concerns about supervision and have not heard of any inappropriate behavior between day care children. Children interviewed stated that they felt safe at the day care but did not corroborate any inappropriate behavior between day care children.
A staff member was dismissed shortly after this allegation was brought to S1’s attention. S1 states that staff member was mostly sedentary while on the play yard and had to be asked to reposition for supervision on multiple occasions. This along with other issues culminated in the staff’s dismissal.
Based on the information gathered during this investigation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred and therefore are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited on the above allegations. This report was reviewed and discussed with the Facility Representative, Jessica Eusebio. Appeal Rights were provided.
Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 days from today's visit. |