1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation interviews were conducted with staff, children, subject’s parents, medical professionals, children services and law enforcement staff, former and current daycare parents, and other potential witnesses. Medical records and reports from law enforcement and children services agencies were reviewed. Medical records could not medically conclude where, when, or who could have injured C1. Licensees denied the allegation, claiming C1 was not injured at the daycare facility and was not left unsupervised at any time. Family members claim C1 was not injured at home. Former and current daycare parents interviewed did not identify any concerns regarding the facility or the level of care and supervision being provided.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies cited today. Appeal Rights will be provided. A “read receipt” will be requested for receipt of this report.
|