1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | page 2
In reference to the allegation that facility staff forced child to eat. Date of alleged violation could not be established. Investigation revealed that one staff alleged seeing another staff not allow child to get up from table until food was finished. One staff denied allegation and two staff did not witness alleged incident. LPA interviewed Seven of Twelve Children from 9:00am to 11:00am.. LPA was unable to qualify two children. A third child had only been in the program for a few days. The fourth and fifth child could not communicate with LPA . Six of Twelve children indicated they can stop eating when they want. One of twelve children indicated s/he had could not get up until they finished their food because teacher did not allow it. Five of Five parents were interviewed from 1:00pm to 2:00pm and all indicated there were no issues or concerns with facility.
In reference to the allegation that staff scratched child's face. Staff interviews conducted from 11:00 to 1:00pm indicated; one staff denied allegation, two staff denied seeing staff scratch child's face and fourth staff indicated s/he observed staff scratch child's face not purposely. LPA interviewed Seven of Twelve Children interviewed denied seeing or having their faces scratched by staff. LPA was unable to qualify two children. A third child had only been in the program for a few days. The fourth and fifth child could not communicate with LPA. Five of Five parents interviewed from 1:00pm to 2:00pm all indicated there were no issues or concerns with facility.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. |