1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
Telephone interviews with director and complainant were conducted by LPA Nguyen and Valencia. During the interview, director disclosed that due to the new limits on group sizes from the Health Department, the facility would not have adequate room to accept subject child and the aide (not facility staff) who provided additional assistance to subject child. The aide would be taking a spot from a child of an essential worker. Director also stated there was no way the facility discriminating against the child with disability but trying to keep the entire school safe by not having an unfamiliar adult in the facility. Director also stated as soon as the pandemic is gone, the child and aide can return to the facility right away.
Based on the information gathered from LPAs' interviews and document reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was not posted due to tele-investigation Covide-19 State of Emergency. Appeal Rights was explained. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) will be provided through email and their signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report.
|