1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation on 05/18/23, LPA Chan conducted observation of children in care, reviewed incident reports, and interviewed facility staff. On 05/19/23 and 05/22/23 phone interviews with parents were conducted.
On 05/18/23, during observation, LPA assessed no outward visible injuries to 9 infant children in care.
On 05/18/23, 3 of 3 facility staff were interviewed regarding allegation. Staff interviewed stated they were not aware of any unexplained injuries sustained by any day care children. For any injury that occurs a notification is sent to parents through Procare app or by text message.
On 05/19/23 and 05/22/23, LPA attempted to interview via phone call 8 parents. 5 of the 8 parents responded and no concerns related to the allegation.
Children were not interviewed to age and being non-verbal.
Due to inconsistent statements obtained or information did not corroborate allegations, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In the areas that were evaluated, NO deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit.
Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility Director Rebekah Bay was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalty of $100. “The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.” This report LIC 9099 was provided to the director. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report.
Page 2 of 2
|