1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation, LPA conducted virtual and telephone interviews with 5 school age children, 5 parents, assistant at the Family Child-care home and the licensee. LPA reviewed the children’s roster provided by the Licensee.
The complainant stated that the licensee pulled a child’s ear. The licensee denied the allegation. Adult assistant denied the allegation and stated the only form of discipline utilized is re-direction and time out based on the age of child. Additional day care children interviewed did not make any disclosures but received positive feedback for the care and supervision from the Licensee. Parents interviewed also did not provide any negative feedback.
Based on the information gathered from the interviews conducted there were no discrepancies among the statements provided by the children, assistant, licensee and the interviewed parents.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged personal rights violation: licensee pulled daycare child's ear did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted via Face time. Licensee acknowledged the document via email send by LPA. |