1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 9/12/2024, the LPA interviewed the Reporting Party (RP). RP provided the names of Staff that Child #1 (C1) identified as present during the alleged incident. The RP agreed to provide pictures of a injury on C1’s face that was suspicious. RP stated Child #1 (C1) said that 2 adults possibly parents of another child, handled C1 in a rough manner. The man had white hair and a hat on, and the other adult was a tall woman holding a brown dog in her arm. The RP stated that the man hit C1 on his back and the woman grabbed C1 face and pressed C1 neck back.
On 9/12/2024, the LPA interviewed five facility staff. When asked about the alleged incident, staff #1 (S1) said “I interviewed the head teachers and the nap teachers (Staff #2, #3, and #4) and they didn’t see anything.” When asked why C1 would make the allegation above, S1 said “I can’t say anything because there was no man, no woman, no dog in the classroom. The only fact that was true in C1’s story is the cranberries.” S1 said C1 was always supervised by qualified staff while in care. When asked about the incident, S2 said, “I was sitting with C1 for a few minutes until C1 fell asleep.” S2 explained that when C1 woke up they “walked into the classroom where C1 stayed with two staff. When asked about a man and a woman carrying a dog, S2 said, “No. It was just me and my two other teachers." S1 and S2 denied the allegation happened. S3 and S4 denied anything unusual happened but were unable to say whether the allegation did or did not happen. S5 denied a man or a woman fitting C1’s description was ever in the school and denied the allegation happened. S5 and S6 stated animals are not allowed in the school.
On 9/12/24, the LPA attempted to interview 5 children. None of the children selected qualified for an interview at the time of the visit.
On 9/12/24, the LPA received photography of C1. The photography shows a scratch-like mark across C1’s left cheek. The mark’s origin is unknown. According to a local law enforcement case report, staff’s statements, and reporting party statements, the mark was not observed until 9/5/24. It was unclear whether the mark happened while C1 was in care at the facility. |