1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C
During the investigation LPA conducted 2 physical plant inspections, interviewed staff members, parents, obtained facility children's roster and reviewed staff files. Children were not interviewed due to their young age. Complainant stated a child, name and gender unknown, was observed being pulled by the leg and arm by Staff #2. Staff #2 was attempting to get the child closer by pulling on the child’s leg, then arm, to bring the child within reach.
All staff interviewed including Staff #2 denied any inappropriate incident occurred while infant was in care. Parents interviewed stated they had no concerns with any of the staff members at the facility in the infant program. Through interviews with staff members and parents, it could not be determined if there was a violation of the children’s personal rights as a result of staff handling children roughly.
Based on LPA observations, document reviews and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence was not met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with Director, Seth, Pinky. Notice of Site Visit posted. Director was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Director was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. |