1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (page 2)
Children were interviewed during the inspection on 4/7/22 and 4/20/22, and these interviews did not provide any preponderance of evidence to support the allegation. It was determined by LPA that parent interviews were not to be conducted for information related to this specific incident/allegation. From these interviews with staff and children; observations of the classrooms, there was insufficient information to create a preponderance of evidence to support these allegations, in any way.
Based on all this information LPA gathered, the preponderance of evidence standard for the allegation was not met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. From all of the available information obtained by LPA during the course of the investigation, that there is insufficient evidence indicating that Staff did not provide adequate supervision when child was choked by another child. Based on all of the information LPA gathered, LPA was not able to determine that this allegation was false or untrue. Therefore LPA cannot make the determination that this allegation is unfounded; and the most accurate findings would remain at unsubstantiated.
Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. |