1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
During the investigation LPA Odom interviewed Complaining Party, Licensee, 1 staff, 2 children and 4 parents. LPA Odom reviewed the Children’s Roster, police report, and took pictures of the facility.
During an interview on 09/02/22, Licensee (S1) stated, there were times C1 did not want to eat the food that was provided from home or the childcare. C1 was a picky eater and S1 would supplement meals with shakes when child did not want to eat. S1 stated they would inform parents when C1 did not want to eat. S1 denied force feeding C1. S1 stated they do not discipline infants S1 will only talk to the child when they are not behaving. S1 disclosed when C1 left the childcare parents were satisfied with the care and never disclosed any concerns. According to the police report, S1 denied the allegation regarding bruises and marks on C1.
During an interview on 09/02/22, Staff #2 (S2) stated during the time they worked in the childcare S1 would feed the infants. There were times S2 would assist with feeding the infants if they did not want to eat. S2 stated C1 did not want to eat the meals that were provided from home and they would inform the parents. S2 disclosed they never observed S1 force feed C1. S2 stated they never observed C1 with any bruises while in care.
During the investigation 2 children qualified for interviews on 08/16/22 and 09/02/22. According to children’s statements their wasn’t enough information gathered to determine if the allegation occurred in the childcare facility.
LPA Odom attempted to interview 20 parents; however only 4 parents were available on 09/19/22 and 09/20/22 for interviews. None of the parents disclosed any concerns with the childcare.
Based on LPA facility inspection, observations, interviews conducted with complaint party, licensee, 1 assistant, 2 children and 4 parents, records reviewed, and pictures taken by LPA, it has been determined there was insufficient evidence that Licensee caused injuries to C1, Licensee handled C1 in a rough manner, and Licensee forced fed C1. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
Continue to page 3. |