1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | **page 2**
The licensee later stated a possible scenario of how the injury could have happened. RP states that when child was asked to explain what happened in the presence of licensee, child stated that licensee hurt him. The licensee brushed it off. Licensee denies that she hit or injured the child and suggested the child could have sustained injuries from helping with the unboxing of holiday decorations.
During the investigation, LPA interviewed 3 staff, 7 parents, 5 children, and reviewed facility records. All staff reported that redirection and time out are used to discipline the children, and physical discipline is never used. Staff denied witnessing licensee hit any children in care.
Children reported that licensee talks to them after being in time out. Several children reported that at times licensee yells at the children if they tell her “no”, are not listening to her, or are not eating their food. Children reported that sometimes she yells in a mean way and sometimes not, as a result of the yelling some children may cry because their feelings are hurt. Children also reported that licensee mostly makes C1 cry and sometimes other kids makes C1 cry also. Children reported that several children in care including C1 has been hit by Licensee mostly because they didn’t listen or told her “no”. Children reported that they witnessed C1 being hit by Licensee on the buttocks (over the diaper) when the child didn’t want to eat.
Most parents interviewed reported that they are happy with the care children receive, however, an additional parent was concerned about the care and supervision and as a result removed the child from the day care. Parent added that she doesn’t believes licensee was intentionally trying to hurt the kids, however she had concerns.
Based on interviews conducted and additional documents, the facility staff handled children in a rough manner by disciplining them inappropriately by hitting on the children when they are misbehaving. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation of the child sustained unexplained injuries while in care is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 Section 102423(a)(4) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
**continued on page 3** |