1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C-2
All parents interviewed stated the licensees are great, very communicative. Parents were aware the discipline procedure is time out. No parent expressed any concerns about care and supervision or discipline practices. In the interviews conducted the children, the children stated they like their day care, the licensee, and co-licensee. One child stated when children don’t listen, they go to time out for a little while to think about what they did, and then they apologize and go back to play again. Some children could not be interviewed due being non-verbal.
Based on LPA observations, review of discipline policy, and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence was not met, therefore the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with the licensee, Maryam Javanmashmool via tele-inspection on this date. Appeal Rights were reviewed and explained. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 1/16) were emailed to the licensee. First level appeals should be sent to the Regional Manager to the address listed above. The licensee will email a received acknowledgement as her signature for this report due to the tele-inspection delivery by typing, “I have read and received the Investigation Report, I acknowledge receipt” in the subject line of the return email. |