1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
During the investigation it was discovered the allegation of lack of supervise arose from viewing the video camera for the classroom. When observing the video of the classroom the restroom cannot be observed for privacy reasons. From the video it cannot be seen if the staff went into the restroom or stand in the doorway. LPA conducted interviews and it was disclosed the staff sit on a chair in the doorway so they can supervise the classroom as well as the children in the restroom. LPA Taylor observed the chair in the doorway of the restroom upon entering the classroom. LPA Taylor observed the staff sit in the chair and the line of supervision is within regulations for both the classroom and the restroom. It was disclosed there is a second staff in the classroom. This allegation lack of supervision is found to be Unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit.
An exit interview was completed. The report was reviewed and discussed. Appeal Rights were discussed. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days.
The facility representative was informed that the “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. The “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted on or adjacent to the door. |