1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff cover infants faces during nap.
Staff 1 (S1) stated the staff members do not cover child’s face while sleeping. S2 stated all teachers watch the babies as they sleep, no blankets in the crib; however, they may put blankets up to the babies’ waist, when the babies fall asleep. S2 stated some parents give them their baby’s blanket and tell them they like the smell of it, then the teachers take it off when the babies fall asleep. S3 stated S3 does not notice a blanket over the children heads, it’s too dangerous. S3 stated S3 does not think they have any teachers that put the blankets over the children’s head because they have to watch them and be very careful. S4 stated one child put the blanket over his head himself, that’s the way he likes to sleep; however, when child falls asleep, S4 takes the blanket off the child’s head. S5 stated the children have their own blankets and sheets. The children’s blankets are never over their head while sleeping because the teachers never know what may happen with the blankets over the children’s heads.
FS1 witnessed a teacher would cover the infants faces with blankets in their cribs to get them to go to sleep faster and stated the teacher would immediately uncover their faces as nothing is to be in the cribs. FS2 witnessed, in the infant classroom, babies’ faces were often covered by a blanket/sheet by the teacher because according to FS2, “it helped the child sleep”. FS3 stated for nap time all the babies’ heads were always covered and FS3 would ask them to stop and they would continue to do it. P4 stated P4 have been told by other parents that blankets have been placed in infants’ cribs.
During the course of the investigation, LPA Torrence conducted phone interviews with five parents. 4 out 5 parents had concerns and issues with the daycare. Interviewed parents’ concerns were the complaint allegations mention above which were told to them by teachers and other parents.
Based on the information gathered from LPA’s interviews, and review of pictures, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division & Chapter 1,101430(a)(3)(C) Infant Care Activities, 101223(a)(2) Personal Rights, 101430(a)(3)(B) Infant Care Activities, 101223(a)(3) Personal Rights, and 101430(a)(3)(D) Infant Care Activities, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
If the facility receives a Type A violation, the licensee shall post and provide copies of the report to parents/guardians of the children in care at the facility by the next business day and shall provide to the parents/guardians of children newly enrolled at the facility during the next 12 months. In addition, the licensee shall immediately post upon receipt the Proof of Correction for 30 consecutive days and provide a copy to current and enrolling parents. The licensee is to keep Acknowledgement Receipt (LIC 9224) signed by parents in each child’s file. In addition, the licensee shall immediately post upon receipt the Proof of Correction for 30 consecutive days.
Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) was provided and explained. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report. |