1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
when they got to C1 , C1 had already been taken down the playground equipment by S 2 and S3. Interview with S2 indicated they assisted S3 in getting child down from playground equipment. S2 indicated C1 was panicking and had made it difficult for S3 to bring C1 down alone so S2 assisted in bringing C1 down. S2 stated the space between the wooden slate and the iron bar was more than sufficient for child. LPA was unable to interview S3 they were on vacation. Interview with C1 divulged that they were climbing the equipment and got stuck but that S3 helped them right away, C1 further indicated they hurt their back and cried. Interview with C2 indicated C1.... "was climbing the bars, and was crying but teachers helped(c1)"
Based on interviews conducted, review of records and review of playground equipment no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit.
Appeal Rights were discussed with Ms. Teel A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.Posting Requirements Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director, Ms. Teel.
|