1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
LPAs interviewed total of 7 staff who have worked in the infant/toddler program. The staff denied being out of ratio although there were discrepancies in the staffs' statements. LPA reviewed the internal Kindercare documentation for children which is called Child Supervision Records (CSR). LPAs reviewed the parents' sign in and out of children's time and date randomly for last week and this week. The staffs' time cards showing their time in and out were also reviewed. LPA also talked to two children's representatives at the time of dropping off their children. LPAs found some discrepancies on the CSR documentarians as far as time in and out of staff and children. Based on all the information received by interviews and reviewing of documents today there are not enough evidence, witness, and documentation to support if the allegation is true or not.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging staff did not use best practices with the child, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Appeal Rights was explained. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) was provided and their signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report.
Exit interview was conducted.
An updated pamphlet regarding safe sleep regulations in childcare and a pamphlet for lead poisoning facts were given to the director on the last inspection date.
This report ends here. |