1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C
During the investigation LPA conducted 2 physical plant inspections, interviewed 5 staff members, 8 children, obtained staff timecards and a copy of the children's roster. All staff interviewed denied any inappropriate incident occurred while children in care. Staff stated they often guide children by hold a child’s hands and leading the child. This is especially with a new child who just started the program. Staff related that the child in question sometimes cries and asking for the parents. Staff stated their protocol of discipline is to talk to the child and if needed, staff will separate the child from the group temporarily, but keeping them active with worksheets or an activity. During interviews conducted with the children, the children disclosed that when a child doesn’t listen, the child will get time out by sitting at a table to do worksheet. Children disclosed like coming to school and like their teachers.
Based on LPA observations and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence was not met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with the Director, Dharmendra Pal. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. Director was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Director was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above.
|