1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 9099C
During the investigation LPA conducted 2 physical inspections via tele-inspection, interviewed 3 staff members, 7 children, obtained staff timecard, children’s sign in/out and a copy of the children's roster. All staff interviewed denied of operating out of ratio. LPA completed a review of the week of 11/02/20 to 11/06/20 of staff timecards, children’s sign-in/out sheets, and daily schedules do not support the allegation. Based on the records reviewed, there appeared to be enough staff present to maintain ratio with the number of children signed in. However, there is no way to determine where the staff were stationed within the facility. All parents interviewed stated the facility is good. No parent expressed any concerns about facility being out of ratio.
Based on LPA observations, interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence was not met, therefore the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with the director, Dharmendra Pal, via tele-inspection on this date. Appeal Rights were reviewed and explained. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 1/16) were emailed to the director. First level appeals should be sent to the Regional Manager to the address listed above. The director will email a received acknowledgement as her signature for this report due to the tele-inspection delivery by typing, “I have read and received the Investigation Report, I acknowledge receipt” in the subject line of the return email. |