1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course on investigation, LPA interviewed 4 staff member, 5 parents, and review children record. Children were not interviewed due to being young and being non-verbal.
During the staff interviews, Staff #1 (S1) stated the following: On 1/13/25, C1 was picked up by Parent #2 (P2) at 3:15 PM. P2 returned to facility 10 minutes later and told S1 that C1 had a scratch on top of right hand. All 4 staff did not see what happened to C1 right hand. S1 and Staff #2 (S2) stated they did not see or hear C1 cry or be upset when playing outside. S2 stated S2 observed C1 was playing in playground with leaves. S1 and S3 think C1 got a small about 1/2-inch scratch that was very faint from the leaves that fell from the tree. S1 completed the Ouchy report and gave it to P2. Parent #1 (P1) provided photos of C1 scratches on top of right hand to LPA. The scratch was about 1/2 inch in length and LPA could barely see the scratch.
S1 also stated on Monday 1/13/25 at around 6:30pm, Parent #1 (P1) left a message asking S1 about the bruises on C1 legs. S1 did not see bruises on child on 1/13/25. S1 stated S1 did not see any bruises on C1’s legs on the previous Friday, 1/10/25 either because it was warm outside so S1 changed C1’s pants into short and S1 did not observe any bruises on C1’s legs. S1 always checks all children for bruising and scratches before children leave facility. S2 stated on an unknown date (S2 could not remember dates and times), S2 observed slight faded bruise on C1’s both legs. S2 saw bruises when S2 changed child’s diaper. S2 did not know how and when the child got the bruise; however, the bruises looked very old so it could happen at home.
During the parent’s interview, 5 out of 5 parents did not make any disclosure regarding the above allegation.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews, and record review, the preponderance evidence of day care child sustained injuries while in care has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Page 2 of 3
|