| During staff interviews, Staff 1 (S1) admitted to mocking the children but “no malicious intent.”
During children interview, 2 children stated they have not witnessed staff mock other children.
During parent interviews, 1 of 5 parents stated they are concerned about staff not properly supervising children resulting to children getting injured or hurt.
Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A substantiated finding means that the complaint is substantiated, and the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.
See LIC9099D for a Type B deficiency cited in violation of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Section 101223(a)(3) Personal Rights. Civil Penalty assessed for failure to correct a repeat violation from 10/10/24.
Technical Support Program (TSP) was discussed with the director.
An exit interview was conducted and report and deficiency discussed with Director Taryn Stephens. The Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The director was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Appeal Rights were Provided.
|