1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3
In reference to the allegation that Staff did not notify authorized representative of incident., the following was found; The investigation included interviews with staff, parents, review of facility records, including but not limited to review of ouch reports, policies and procedures for reporting incidents.
It was found that on 12/14/22 C2 bumped into C1. According to interview with staff , S1 and S2 C1 was having diaper changed when C2 ran and bumped into C1 which caused C1 to fall and hit head at edge of book shelf. .Per interviews with s1 and s2, C1 was given an ice pack and notified administration as per policy for head injuries. Interviews with S! and S2 revealed that C1 began to feel ill, vomited and had fever. Administration was called who in turn called C1's parent for pick up for a separate issue, child became ill after lunch with vomit and fever.. Interview with S1 and S2 indicate S1 completed the report even though she was not the one who observed it because s/he wanted to make sure report was given to C1's parent prior to pick up. S1 and S2 state they had not been told if C1's parent was given the accident report on 12/14/22 and they do not have it with the classroom copies. Interview with S3 indicates that Lead Guides give the reports to the parents at pick up. Interview with six other staff indicate they could not recall giving a report to C1's parent. Interview with C1's parent indicates s/he was not told about C1's head injury until Friday 12/16/22 and she was told by S3 who had her sign the report on 12/16/22. Interviews with 9 out of 9 staff f who could not recall giving incident report to C1's parent and interview with C1's parent indicating s/he did not receive until two days after incident . Based on LPAs review of records, accident/interaction report and interviews with staff and parents. which were conducted , the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
In reference to the allegation that Staff did not report incident to CCL. Interview with assistant Director indicates she did not report this to Community Care Licensing. Further interview with S1 and S3 indicate C1's parent notified staff that they had taken C1 to obtain medical attention. LPA's review of facility file in the Regional Office did not show an unusual incident report was made for C1 falling and hitting head on 12/14/22 even after staff were notified that parent sought medical attention.
Based on LPAs review of records, accident/interaction report and interviews with staff and parents. which were conducted , the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. |