1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2
During the investigation LPA Odom interviewed complaining party, director, 6 staff members, 6 parents, conducted a facility inspection and reviewed the children’s roster and personnel report. LPA did not interview children due to children being none verbal.
During the investigation, Director (S1) was interviewed on 5/3/22. S1 disclosed they observed S5 grab the infant by the hands and pulling them up to move the infant across the room. S1 stated they immediately verbally correct S5 by telling S5 they cannot grab the infant from the hands and pick up the infant in that manner. S1 disclosed S5 was never written up but they had to constantly trained and verbally correct when S5 was in the childcare center.
During the investigation, 6 staff members were interviewed on 6/8/22, 7/7/22 and 7/12/22. None of the staff disclosed observing S5 grabbing C1 and dragging them across the room or any of the other infants. Staff #2 (S2) disclosed there were a couple times S5 raised their voice to the children and S1 would have a conversation with S5 on their tone of voice. Staff #3 (S3) believed S5 was not happy at the childcare center and childcare was not their passion. S5 disclosed staff would intendedly grab children from their hands and pull them up. S5 stated the childcare center never provided infant training.
On 6/21/22 and 7/7/22 LPA Odom attempted interviewing 8 parents, however 6 parents were available for interviews. None of the parents disclosed any concern with the childcare center, they are satisfied with the childcare center. Parent #1 (P1) stated they are aware that the childcare center has discipline policies but that has never been an issue with their child.
Based on LPA’s facility inspection, observations, interviews conducted with complainant party, director, 6 staff members, 6 parents, and records reviewed, it has been determined that S5 violated children’s personal rights by handling children in a rough manner. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, 101223(a)(3) Personal Rights is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Continue to page 3. |